论无独立请求权第三人的权利保障(论文12000字)
摘 要
随着现代社会经济交往的复杂化以及人与人之间关系的多样化，严守民事诉讼当事人主义将无法适应当代的社会经济基础，有可能导致诉讼资源浪费、诉讼迟延等损害诉讼当事人的情况发生，这些原因也促使了民事诉讼第三人制度的出现。当今，无论是司法实践还是法学理论研究领域，诉讼第三人制度的重要性都是日益显著的，但是我国现行立法对诉讼第三人制度规定过于粗略，难以应付当前复杂的民事纠纷，并无法实现诉讼公正的的诉讼制度的基本价值。因此本文将以诉讼第三人制度作为研究对象，且以无独立请求权第三人为重点进行研究。本文将通过案列分析、比较分析等方法，主要通过研究外国无独立请求权第三人制度，以求对我国无独立请求权第三人制度进行完善或重构。
关键词：我国无独立请求权第三人制度重构；外国无独立请求权第三人制度；诉讼制度追求价值
Abstract
In recent years, P2P peer-to-peer lending, as a new industry of internet finance, has attracted the attention of the public in a flash. however, due to the low market access threshold, imperfect credit system, lack of government supervision and so on, the risks of the platform have been expanding, and the platform has frequently closed down or run away. It was not until 2016 that the interim measures for the management of business activities of information intermediary institutions in peer-to-peer lending were released and implemented that the status of China's P2P peer-to-peer lending platform was changed to some extent, such as unclear nature, lack of industry access rules and imperfect regulatory system. in this new situation, the concept, mode and regulatory status of P2P peer-to-peer lending platform were summarized, and the new interim measures were interpreted in combination with the development of China's P2P peer-to-peer lending platform. At the same time, through the understanding and comparison of UK and US platform supervision mode, and then put forward to improve the peer-to-peer lending credit system, improve the bank funds depository system, improve the information disclosure rules, improve the level of industry self-discipline and other ideas to improve the legal supervision of P2P network credit platform in China.
Keywords: The third party system reconstruction without independent claim in China; The third party system without independent claims; The value of litigation system.
目 录
摘 要 I
Abstract II
一、无独立请求权第三人制度的发展历程 1
二、无独立请求权第三人制度追求的价值 2
三、我国现行无独立请求权第三人制度的概述 3
（一）我国现行无独立请求权第三人制度的概念 3
（二）现行立法中有关无独立请求权第三人制度的缺陷 4
（三）我国无独立请求权第三人制度的改进方向 5
四、代表国家无独立请求权第三人制度的概述 6
（一）美国无独立请求权第三人的分类 6
（二）德国无独立请求权第三人的分类 7
（三）日本无独立请求权第三人的分类 9
五、我国无独立请求权第三人制度重构的建议及设想 10
（一）被告型第三人的概念、特点 10
（二）被告型第三人应当享有的诉讼权利 11
（三）辅助型第三人的构建 12
（四）辅助型第三人应当享有的具体诉讼权利 13
（五）完善与程序保障有关的制度 13
参考文献： 15
致 谢 16 |
