论故意杀人罪的主观方面认定(论文10500字)
On the subjective aspect of the crime of intentional homicide
摘 要
故意杀人罪作为古老的自然犯罪,尤其考验着犯罪人的主观恶性与司法公正。本文在对若干司法案例进行分析之后，发现故意杀人罪的主观方面对死刑适用起着重要的影响作用。然而，纵观近年来几起热门杀人案件可知，法官对案件的判决缺乏必要的说理，公众对判决结果缺乏信服，立法的模糊性加之司法指导的粗泛化，使得社会舆论对司法的公正性产生了质疑。本文试图抓住主观方面这一关键，通过探讨犯罪人的主观方面来促使死刑的适用以及死刑执行方式的选择更加合理化，从而限制法官的自由裁量权，实现个案的公平，维护司法的公信力。通过相关理论的论证以及案例的对比分析，本文认为主观方面是故意杀人死刑适用的排除情节。此外，在死刑执行方式的选择上应当综合考虑犯罪人的罪过程度、犯罪动机、犯罪情感和犯罪后态度，将这几方面要素按照主观恶性大小进行分类赋值，按照罪过程度来进行区别划分，可以分成有预谋的直接故意杀人、无预谋的直接故意杀人和间接故意杀人三种情况，主观方面综合评分达到适用死刑的标准时，就判处该犯罪嫌疑人死刑，但是缓期两年执行，如果不能符合这个标准 ，就判处立即执行死刑。
关键词：故意杀人罪；主观方面；认定
ABSTRACT
Intentional homicide is an ancient natural crime, especially the subjective viciousness and judicial justice of the perpetrator. After analyzing some judicial cases, this paper finds that the subjective aspect of intentional homicide plays an important role in the application of the death penalty. However, in the past few cases of popular killings, the judges lacked the necessary reasoning for the judgment of the case, the public lacked conviction on the judgment results, the ambiguity of the legislation and the generalization of judicial guidance, which made the public opinion fair to justice. There was a doubt. This paper attempts to grasp the subjective aspect, and explores the subjective aspect of the offender to promote the application of the death penalty and the choice of the execution method of the death penalty, thereby limiting the discretion of the judge, achieving the fairness of the case and safeguarding the credibility of the judiciary. Through the argumentation of relevant theories and the comparative analysis of the cases, this paper considers that the subjective aspect is the exclusionary scenario applicable to the intentional killing of death penalty. In addition, in the choice of execution method of death penalty, the criminal's sinfulness degree, criminal motive, criminal sentiment and post-criminal attitude should be considered comprehensively. These elements should be classified according to the subjective malignant size, and the distinction can be made according to the degree of sin. Divided into premeditated direct intentional murder, unpredicted direct intentional homicide and indirect intentional homicide. When the subjective comprehensive score reaches the standard for applying the death penalty, the criminal suspect is sentenced to death, but the suspension is implemented for two years. The standard is sentenced to immediate execution.
KEYWORDS: Intentional homicide; subjective aspect；Identification
目 录
论故意杀人罪的主观方面认定 1
摘 要 I
关键词：故意杀人罪；主观方面；认定 I
ABSTRACT II
论故意杀人罪的主观方面认定 1
1.引言 1
1.1研究背景 1
1.2研究意义 1
2.主观方面概述 4
2.1主观方面的界定 4
2.1.1主观与客观的界定 4
2.1.2主观方面的内涵 4
2.2主观方面的内容 6
2.2.1犯罪动机和目的 6
2.2.2犯罪情感 6
2.2.3罪过程度 7
2.3主观方面对量刑的独特意义 8
2.3.1独立反映犯罪行为人的主观恶性和人身危险性 8
2.3.2体现“宽严相济”的刑事政策 8
2.3.3有利于犯罪预防功能的实现 9
3.故意杀人罪主观方面问题研究 9
3.1决定故意杀人罪死刑适用的主要因素 9
3.1.1刑罚配置具有特殊性 9
3.1.2社会关注度高 9
3.1.3刑事政策性强 10
3.2故意杀人罪死刑适用的现状 10
3.2.1死刑适用的法律规定不明确 10
3.2.2死刑适用的理论不足 11
3.2.3缺乏量刑指导 11
4.主观方面对故意杀人罪死刑适用的影响 11
4.1主观方面各要素的分类与组合 11
4.1.1罪过程度分类 11
4.1.2犯罪动机分类 11
4.1.3犯罪情感分类 12
4.2主观方面对故意杀人罪死刑适用的具体影响 13
4.2.1有预谋的直接故意杀人 13
4.2.2无预谋的直接故意杀人 13
4.2.3间接故意杀人 13
5.结语 14
致 谢 15
参考文献 16 |
